Quid Pro Quo Legal Agreement

Quid pro quo would continue to be used by Anglophones in the legal and diplomatic context as an exchange of equivalent goods or services, and it still is today. [5] Quid pro quo is a Latin term used to describe an exchange of something precious. Literal translation means “something for something.” There are several phrases in the English language instead of quid pro quo like “You scratch my back, and I scratch yours” or “tit for tat.” Quid pro quo is also present in professional networking. A businessman can turn to other professionals who share the same interest or passion. A group of companies is created in which a member of the group can offer value to other members of the group, for example. B, education on a relevant topic, which is essential to the basic skills of the receiving member, in exchange for future services. The quid pro quo is also important for those who want to connect to start their careers. The Latin phrase quid by quo originally implied that something had been replaced, as in this one instead. Early use by Anglophones followed the original Latin sense, with deposits in the 1530s where the term was supposed to replace one drug with another, whether involuntary or fraudulent. At the end of the same century, quid pro quo became a more recent use to describe equivalent exchanges. [3] Another example of the use of the term quid pro quo in the legislation is Canadian author Catherine McKinnnon`s proposal, which describes a variety of sexual harassment in the workplace that she calls quid pro quo harassment: work benefits limited to the availability of sexual or physical intercourse, refusal of dismissal, discipline or negative recommendations for advertising.

In the United Kingdom, the unilateral nature of a contract is covered by the Terms of Contract Act 1977 and various revisions and amendments; a clause may be cancelled or the entire contract may be cancelled if it is considered abusive (i.e. unilateral and not as a custom to the contrary); However, this is a matter of civil law and not a matter of common law. Quid pro quo agreements are sometimes considered unfavourable in a business environment. For example, in a reciprocity agreement between a large financial firm and a company, the financial company could change the company`s poor rating in exchange for a stake in the business. This is a bad business practice that is clearly against the rules. By doing the right thing, the financial company should put the interests of its investment clients first, before any potential gain for the home itself. This example illustrates, however, that quid pro quos are often in the nature of a favour for a service, as opposed to a direct exchange of goods or services. Quid pro quo in the legal context is most often used in the case of contract law under the expression mutual consideration. In contract law, the reflection is on something valuable that one person promised to another.

If there is mutual respect, both sides are committed to giving something valuable. Quid pro quo harassment occurs when an employer or supervisor makes sexual progress towards an employee and subordinates the promotion of employment to the employee`s reaction. In order for a case of sexual harassment to be committed against a person against participation, the harasser must be in a position of power and be empowered to grant or deprive the worker of work benefits. Another example of a dubious quid-pro-quo agreement in the economy is a soft-dollar deal.